↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Dysregulation of Cortical and Subcortical Metabolism After Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Chronic Dysregulation of Cortical and Subcortical Metabolism After Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12035-018-1276-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. McGuire, Erica A. K. DePasquale, Miki Watanabe, Fatima Anwar, Laura B. Ngwenya, Gowtham Atluri, Lindsey E. Romick-Rosendale, Robert E. McCullumsmith, Nathan K. Evanson

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. Although chronic disability is common after TBI, effective treatments remain elusive and chronic TBI pathophysiology is not well understood. Early after TBI, brain metabolism is disrupted due to unregulated ion release, mitochondrial damage, and interruption of molecular trafficking. This metabolic disruption causes at least part of the TBI pathology. However, it is not clear how persistent or pervasive metabolic injury is at later stages of injury. Using untargeted 1H-NMR metabolomics, we examined ex vivo hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, frontal cortex, and brainstem tissue in a rat lateral fluid percussion model of chronic brain injury. We found altered tissue concentrations of metabolites in the hippocampus and thalamus consistent with dysregulation of energy metabolism and excitatory neurotransmission. Furthermore, differential correlation analysis provided additional evidence of metabolic dysregulation, most notably in brainstem and frontal cortex, suggesting that metabolic consequences of injury are persistent and widespread. Interestingly, the patterns of network changes were region-specific. The individual metabolic signatures after injury in different structures of the brain at rest may reflect different compensatory mechanisms engaged to meet variable metabolic demands across brain regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Computer Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,152,619
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,978
of 3,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,408
of 331,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#74
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.