↓ Skip to main content

Optimal Design of LIDs in Urban Stormwater Systems Using a Harmony-Search Decision Support System

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Management, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Optimal Design of LIDs in Urban Stormwater Systems Using a Harmony-Search Decision Support System
Published in
Water Resources Management, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-2064-8
Authors

F. De Paola, M. Giugni, F. Pugliese, P. Romano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 6 7%
Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 31 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 36%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 35 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,645,475
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Management
#464
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,257
of 330,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Management
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.