| Title |
Wildlife comeback in Flanders: tracing the fault lines and dynamics of public debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-015-0925-5 |
| Authors |
Ann Van Herzele, Noelle Aarts, Jim Casaer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,223,325
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#337
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,369
of 263,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.