↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal obstruction as a cause of death in the mentally disabled

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Intestinal obstruction as a cause of death in the mentally disabled
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12024-018-0007-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danica Cvetković, Vladimir Živković, Irina Damjanjuk, Slobodan Nikolić

Abstract

Two cases of intestinal obstruction in the mentally disabled are reported. The first case concerns 61-year-old oligophrenic woman who resided in a nursing home, where she was found hypotensive and unresponsive. Upon opening the peritoneal cavity at autopsy, extremely dilated (measuring on average 12 cm in diameter) loops of the colon emerged- they compressed the small intestine and other intraperitoneal organs, lifting both hemidiaphragms deep into the pleural cavity. Lodged firmly into the rectum, a partly disintegrated sanitary pad was found. In the second case, young man with Down syndrome was found dead in his room in a nursing facility. At autopsy, a massively dilated stomach and intestinal loops emerged, interposing one of the loops between the liver and right hemidiaphragm (pushing it to the 3rd intercostal space). This was caused by a volvulus - the cecum, the entire ascending colon and hepatic flexure were gangrenous, dilated (the maximum diameter was 15 cm) and twisted in a full circle around the mesenteric attachment. There were no signs of colon perforation. In both cases, intellectual disability was at the core of poor communication and delayed medical treatment, which led to a fatal outcome. Caregivers must be trained to recognize distress in the mentally disabled, especially since the symptoms and signs of gastrointestinal diseases may be subtle, or at least less recognizable. By performing careful physical examination medical staff should search more cautiously for these signs. Any suspicion of mistreatment or neglect of the mentally impaired requires a medico-legal investigation and autopsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Psychology 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,907,830
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#339
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,528
of 333,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.