↓ Skip to main content

Predicting intention to uptake H1N1 influenza vaccine in a university sample

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting intention to uptake H1N1 influenza vaccine in a university sample
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, November 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02057.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Byrne, Jane Walsh, Susanna Kola, Kiran M. Sarma

Abstract

Global pandemic H1N1 was atypical of influenza in that it was associated with high symptom severity among young adults. Higher education institutions were therefore understandably concerned about the potential for high infection rates among students. This study examined intention to uptake H1N1 vaccine between November and December 2009, when the virus was classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as being in the pandemic phase.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,311,953
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#560
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,508
of 250,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.