↓ Skip to main content

Neither the WAD-classification nor the Quebec Task Force follow-up regimen seems to be important for the outcome after a whiplash injury. A prospective study on 186 consecutive patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Neither the WAD-classification nor the Quebec Task Force follow-up regimen seems to be important for the outcome after a whiplash injury. A prospective study on 186 consecutive patients
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00586-008-0675-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jouko Kivioja, Irene Jensen, Urban Lindgren

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,026
of 4,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,548
of 81,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,689 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.