↓ Skip to main content

First molecular detection of the human pathogen Rickettsia raoultii and other spotted fever group rickettsiae in Ixodid ticks from wild and domestic mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
First molecular detection of the human pathogen Rickettsia raoultii and other spotted fever group rickettsiae in Ixodid ticks from wild and domestic mammals
Published in
Parasitology Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00436-018-6036-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Chisu, Cipriano Foxi, Giovanna Masala

Abstract

Tick-borne rickettsioses are recognized as emerging vector-borne infections capable of infecting both human and animal hosts worldwide. This study focuses on the detection and molecular identification of species belonging to the genus Rickettsia in ticks sampled from human, vegetation, and domestic and wild vertebrates in Sardinia. Ticks were tested by PCR targeting gltA, ompA, and ompB genes, followed by sequencing analysis. The results provide evidences of a great variety of Rickettsia species of the Spotted fever group in Ixodid ticks and allow establishing for the first time the presence of R. raoultii in Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. and Dermacentor marginatus ticks in Sardinia island. Rickettsia massiliae was detected on R. sanguineus s.l. and R. aeschlimannii in Hyalomma marginatum and Hy. lusitanicum ticks. In addition, eight D. marginatus ticks were positive for R. slovaca. This study provides further evidence that different Rickettsia species are widespread in Sardinian ticks and that detailed investigations are required to understand the role these tick species play on spotted fever group rickettsiae circulation. More studies will provide new background on molecular epidemiology of zoonotic rickettsiae, the geographical distribution of tick-transmitted rickettsial pathogens, and the involvement of vertebrate hosts in propagation and maintenance of these bacteria in nature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,137,809
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,461
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,279
of 330,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#18
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.