↓ Skip to main content

Continuous production of pectic oligosaccharides from sugar beet pulp in a cross flow continuous enzyme membrane reactor

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Continuous production of pectic oligosaccharides from sugar beet pulp in a cross flow continuous enzyme membrane reactor
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00449-018-1995-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathy Elst, Neha Babbar, Sandra Van Roy, Stefania Baldassarre, Winnie Dejonghe, Miranda Maesen, Stefano Sforza

Abstract

Sugar beet pulp pectin is an attractive source for the production of pectic oligosaccharides, an emerging class of potential prebiotics. The main aim of the present work was to investigate a new process allowing to produce pectic oligosaccharides in a continuous way by means of a cross flow enzyme membrane reactor while using a low-cost crude enzyme mixture (viscozyme). Preliminary experiments in batch and semi-continuous setups allowed to identify suitable enzyme concentrations and assessing filtration suitability. Then, in continuous experiments in the enzyme membrane reactor, residence time and substrate loading were further optimized. The composition of the obtained oligosaccharide mixtures was assessed at the molecular level for the most promising conditions and was shown to be dominated by condition-specific arabinans, rhamnogalacturonans, and galacturonans. A continuous and stable production was performed for 28.5 h at the optimized conditions, obtaining an average pectic oligosaccharide yield of 82.9 ± 9.9% (w/w), a volumetric productivity of 17.5 ± 2.1 g/L/h, and a specific productivity of 8.0 ± 1.0 g/g E/h. This work demonstrated for the first time the continuous and stable production of oligosaccharide mixtures from sugar beet pulp using enzyme membrane reactor technology in a setup suitable for upscaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 29%
Researcher 7 17%
Unspecified 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Unspecified 5 12%
Chemistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,784,715
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#416
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,559
of 341,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them