↓ Skip to main content

A simple and gentle technique for reduction after anterior shoulder dislocation

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A simple and gentle technique for reduction after anterior shoulder dislocation
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00402-015-2279-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Dreu, Werner Aufmesser, Harald Aufmesser, Claudia Dolcet, Georg Feigl, Patrick Sadoghi

Abstract

Anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is a common sports injury. The goal of this study was to evaluate a new procedure for reduction after ASD with respect to success rate, the need for medication for muscle relaxation, sedation, and application of pain medication and put it into context to a systematic literature review. We retrospectively evaluated the new method in 263 patients in an Austrian skiing area from December 2005 till April 2009. We included patients with unilateral ASD and excluded those with a combined trauma and consecutive admission to hospital. The new procedure is performed in a supine position, the therapist takes the patients hand of the injured limb with his one hand and with his other hand counter holds against the acromion. Then he enhances the traction on the upper limp by using his trunk as a kind of fulcrum. With eye contact and instructions to relax, the therapist is able to detect the muscular tension, so that he can adjust the amount of traction accordingly. The presented procedure was successful in all reported cases. For 196 patients (74.5 %) no medication for muscle relaxation, sedation, or pain medication were needed. The new method is a promising option to popular techniques for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations. The benefits of this protocol are a gentle and simple application of the procedure as well as an easy acquisition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Psychology 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#21,162,249
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1,116
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,603
of 265,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.