↓ Skip to main content

Aldehyde dehydrogenase as a marker and functional mediator of metastasis in solid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Aldehyde dehydrogenase as a marker and functional mediator of metastasis in solid tumors
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10585-015-9755-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauricio Rodriguez-Torres, Alison L. Allan

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence indicating that aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity selects for cancer cells with increased aggressiveness, capacity for sustained proliferation, and plasticity in primary tumors. However, emerging data also suggests an important mechanistic role for the ALDH family of isoenzymes in the metastatic activity of tumor cells. Recent studies indicate that ALDH correlates with either increased or decreased metastatic capacity in a cellular context-dependent manner. Importantly, it appears that different ALDH isoforms support increased metastatic capacity in different tumor types. This review assesses the potential of ALDH as biological marker and mechanistic mediator of metastasis in solid tumors. In many malignancies, most notably in breast cancer, ALDH activity and expression appears to be a promising marker and potential therapeutic target for treating metastasis in the clinical setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 33 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Chemistry 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,660,617
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
#199
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,602
of 281,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.