| Title |
Abstracts of the ECTS congress 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00223-017-0267-2 |
| Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,674,104
of 25,263,619 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#231
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,824
of 316,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,263,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.