You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extracellular entrapment and degradation of single-walled carbon nanotubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nanoscale, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c3nr06047k |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Consol Farrera, Kunal Bhattacharya, Beatrice Lazzaretto, Fernando T. Andón, Kjell Hultenby, Gregg P. Kotchey, Alexander Star, Bengt Fadeel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 33% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale
#2,732
of 10,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,595
of 324,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale
#151
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.