↓ Skip to main content

A classification system for virophages and satellite viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
A classification system for virophages and satellite viruses
Published in
Archives of Virology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00705-015-2622-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mart Krupovic, Jens H. Kuhn, Matthias G. Fischer

Abstract

Satellite viruses encode structural proteins required for the formation of infectious particles but depend on helper viruses for completing their replication cycles. Because of this unique property, satellite viruses that infect plants, arthropods, or mammals, as well as the more recently discovered satellite-like viruses that infect protists (virophages), have been grouped with other, so-called "sub-viral agents." For the most part, satellite viruses are therefore not classified. We argue that possession of a coat-protein-encoding gene and the ability to form virions are the defining features of a bona fide virus. Accordingly, all satellite viruses and virophages should be consistently classified within appropriate taxa. We propose to create four new genera - Albetovirus, Aumaivirus, Papanivirus, and Virtovirus - for positive-sense single-stranded (+) RNA satellite viruses that infect plants and the family Sarthroviridae, including the genus Macronovirus, for (+)RNA satellite viruses that infect arthopods. For double-stranded DNA virophages, we propose to establish the family Lavidaviridae, including two genera, Sputnikvirus and Mavirus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,775,793
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#133
of 4,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,718
of 290,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.