↓ Skip to main content

Peace in the Clinic: Rethinking “Global Health Diplomacy” in the Somali Region of Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Peace in the Clinic: Rethinking “Global Health Diplomacy” in the Somali Region of Ethiopia
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11013-015-9455-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Carruth

Abstract

Drawing on ethnographic research with Somalis, within aid organizations, and within health care facilities in the Somali Region of Ethiopia, this article argues that what is called "global health diplomacy," despite its origins and articulations in interstate politics, is fundamentally local and interpersonal. As evidence, I outline two very different health programs in the Somali Region of Ethiopia, and how, in each, existing animosities and political grievances were either reinforced or undermined. I argue that the provision of health care in politically insecure and post-conflict settings like the Somali Region of Ethiopia is precarious but pivotal: medical encounters have the potential to either worsen the conditions in which conflicts and crises recur, or build new interpersonal and governmental relations of trust. Effective global health diplomacy, therefore, cannot be limited to building clinics and donating medicine, but must also explicitly include building positive relationships of trust between oppositional groups within clinical spaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,395,887
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#128
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,149
of 268,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.