Title |
Environmental Tobacco and Wood Smoke Increase the Risk of Legg‐Calvé‐Perthes Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2180-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anjali Benjamin Daniel, Hitesh Shah, Asha Kamath, Vasudev Guddettu, Benjamin Joseph |
Abstract |
The etiology of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) remains unknown. A few studies have suggested passive smoke inhalation may be a risk factor, although the association is not confirmed and a causal relationship has not been established. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 22% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,363,866
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,370
of 7,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,113
of 188,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#18
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.