↓ Skip to main content

Carving out another slice of the pie: Exceptional response to single agent imatinib in an asian female never-smoker with advanced NSCLC with a de-novo PDGFR-α N848 K mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer (01695002), July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carving out another slice of the pie: Exceptional response to single agent imatinib in an asian female never-smoker with advanced NSCLC with a de-novo PDGFR-α N848 K mutation
Published in
Lung Cancer (01695002), July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel J. Klempner, Kyle Gowen, Thomas K. Lee, Viola W. Zhu, Alexa B. Schrock, Vincent A. Miller, Siraj M. Ali, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has emerged as a paradigm for clinical application of precision medicine as optimal therapy is commonly chosen based on genomic biomarkers identified in a patient's tumor sample. Recurrent driver alterations are well described, however, a need to continually identify rare variants remains clinically relevant. We identified an incident case of advanced NSCLC with a PDGFR-α N848 K activation loop mutation with no other concurrent oncogenic drivers. Amino acid sequence alignment confirmed homology to the imatinib-sensitive KIT N822 K activation loop mutation observed in GIST. The patient achieved a 2-year response to single agent imatinib that is ongoing. While PDGFR-α N848 K is rare among public sequencing databases our cases strongly suggests functional relevance and highlights the importance of studying rare variants in NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#2,302
of 3,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,958
of 340,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#41
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.