↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Time Interval from Bariatric Surgery to Conception on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Influence of Time Interval from Bariatric Surgery to Conception on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes
Published in
Obesity Surgery, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3395-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cátia Rasteiro, Célia Araújo, Sara Cunha, Rita Caldas, Joana Mesquita, Adérito Seixas, Nuno Augusto, Carla Ramalho

Abstract

Pregnancy in women submitted to bariatric surgery is increasing. Recommendations for surveillance of these pregnancies have been suggested, but an adequate time interval from surgery to conception, to avoid perinatal negative outcomes, is still controversial. Medical records of pregnancies in women with previous bariatric surgery were retrieved and outcomes were assessed according to three different time thresholds (12, 18 and 24 months). The association between time from surgery to conception and the presence of adverse outcomes was analysed. Eighty-six pregnancies were assessed. Weight gain was higher (p = 0.014) and more adequate (p = 0.041) when pregnancy occurred more than 12 months after surgery. Foetal growth percentile was lower when pregnancy was achieved before 24 months following surgery (p = 0.021). No differences among groups were found in other assessed outcomes (BMI, gestational age at delivery, type of delivery, gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertensive disease, anaemia, preterm delivery, foetal weight, foetal growth restriction, Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive unit) in all considered thresholds. No association between time from surgery to conception and the presence of adverse outcomes was found. Despite differences found in maternal weight gain and foetal growth percentile, our study does not support the recommendation to delay pregnancy based on a fixed deadline. Other factors, including a more individualised approach, need to be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 20 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#3,044
of 3,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,671
of 329,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#55
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.