↓ Skip to main content

On the dewetting of liquefied metal nanostructures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Engineering Mathematics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
On the dewetting of liquefied metal nanostructures
Published in
Journal of Engineering Mathematics, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10665-013-9685-y
Authors

Shahriar Afkhami, Lou Kondic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Professor 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 47%
Mathematics 3 20%
Engineering 3 20%
Chemistry 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,067
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#71
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,368
of 313,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them