| Title |
Application of an extreme winter storm scenario to identify vulnerabilities, mitigation options, and science needs in the Sierra Nevada mountains, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-2003-4 |
| Authors |
Christine M. Albano, Michael D. Dettinger, Maureen I. McCarthy, Kevin D. Schaller, Toby L. Welborn, Dale A. Cox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 16% |
| Engineering | 11 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,579,438
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#988
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,689
of 290,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.