↓ Skip to main content

The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 143)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01060044
Authors

Gerald Midgley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 73 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Lecturer 8 10%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 26%
Engineering 15 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 9%
Computer Science 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#30
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,510
of 61,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them