| Title |
Living post treatment: definitions of those with history and no history of cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-010-0167-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberly M. Kelly, Neel Shah, Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker, Kyle Porter, Doreen Agnese |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,087,771
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#56
of 992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,190
of 196,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them