↓ Skip to main content

4D seismic time-lapse monitoring of an active cold vent, northern Cascadia margin

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Geophysical Research, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 236)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
4D seismic time-lapse monitoring of an active cold vent, northern Cascadia margin
Published in
Marine Geophysical Research, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11001-007-9037-2
Authors

Michael Riedel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 81%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2008.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Marine Geophysical Research
#29
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,095
of 157,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Geophysical Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them