↓ Skip to main content

Inguinal endometriosis, a rare entity of which surgeons should be aware: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of nine cases

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Inguinal endometriosis, a rare entity of which surgeons should be aware: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of nine cases
Published in
Hernia, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10029-018-1797-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Wolfhagen, N. E. Simons, K. H. de Jong, P. J. M. van Kesteren, M. P. Simons

Abstract

Inguinal endometriosis is a rare disease and often misdiagnosed for other, more common groin pathology. We present nine cases of women with inguinal endometriosis with long-term follow-up. In this retrospective case series, the Dutch PALGA system was searched for all patients diagnosed with extrapelvic endometriosis located in the groin in the OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, between 2000 and 2016. Relevant information regarding pre- and postoperative characteristics and symptoms was collected. Follow-up consisted of a telephone call from the attending surgeon. None of the patients had a history of pelvic endometriosis. Typically, they presented with a right-sided swelling in the groin. Preoperative ultrasound and MRI were in most cases inconclusive. In one of two patients fna indicated endometriosis. In only three patients the surgeon considered the diagnosis endometriosis preoperatively. Surgical removal was effective with no reported complications. A coexisting hernia sac was resected in four cases, and there was a suspicion of a persistent processus vaginalis (canal of Nuck) in three, suggesting that a persistent processus vaginalis is possibly an important key to the pathogenesis. In none of the cases there was an indication for mesh implantation. One patient was later diagnosed with pelvic endometriosis. Follow-up by a gynecologist is advised to check for intra-abdominal disease and inform patients on fertility perspective. Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of inguinal endometriosis in fertile women with a lump in the groin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#910
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,396
of 330,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.