↓ Skip to main content

Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, June 1999
DOI 10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas H. Steneck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 12%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#499
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,373
of 36,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them