↓ Skip to main content

A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy
Published in
Scientometrics, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11192-006-0098-9
Authors

Wolfgang Glänzel, Koenraad Debackere, Bart Thijs, András Schubert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 2 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Librarian 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 21%
Computer Science 17 17%
Engineering 8 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,323
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,342
of 66,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them