↓ Skip to main content

Modeling effects of nitrate from non-point sources on groundwater quality in an agricultural watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Modeling effects of nitrate from non-point sources on groundwater quality in an agricultural watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10040-008-0390-2
Authors

Yefang Jiang, George Somers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 13 21%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 33%
Engineering 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,574,392
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#222
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,745
of 92,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them