Title |
Sequential treatment combining cladribine-based re-induction, myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion: a promising treatment for refractory acute myeloid leukemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Hematology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00277-018-3453-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haowen Xiao, Li Li, Yan Pang, Yuanbin Wu, Zujun Jiang, Zenghui Liu, Jiulong Wu, Yang Xiao, Fen Huang, Qifa Liu, Hang Zhang, Yi Luo, He Huang |
Abstract |
We describe the first multicenter prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and immune reconstitution of a novel sequential transplant approach in 24 patients with primary induction failure/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The sequential regimen consisted of cladribine 5 mg/m2/day and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day for 5 days and mitoxantrone 7 mg/m2/day for 3 days, followed by myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) using intravenous busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/day) for 4 days and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day) for 2 days. Patients in CR without acute graft-versus-host disease at day + 90 received prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI). At the time of transplantation, a marrow blast infiltration > 20% or any level of circulating blasts was found in 62.5% of patients. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 29.8%. Overall survival (OS) was 74.5% at 1 year and 56.5% at 2 years. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 1 and 2 years was 62.5 and 50.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that haploidentical related donor, pDLI, and experiencing chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) were protective from relapse. Total T cells and T cell subsets in peripheral blood recovered at 3 months post-HSCT. The expressions of immune checkpoints (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed death 1) were extremely low in T cells over the first 1 year post-transplantation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 44% |