↓ Skip to main content

Obesity as a risk factor in cancer: A national consensus of the Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Obesity as a risk factor in cancer: A national consensus of the Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12094-015-1306-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Goday, I. Barneto, J. M. García-Almeida, A. Blasco, A. Lecube, C. Grávalos, P. Martínez de Icaya, R. de las Peñas, S. Monereo, L. Vázquez, J. E. Palacio, P. Pérez-Segura

Abstract

In the last few years, many prospective studies have demonstrated a clear association between obesity and cancers of the colon and rectum, breast in post-menopausal women, endometrium, kidney, oesophagus and pancreas. Obesity is also associated with a high risk of recurrence and cancer-related death. The pathophysiology of obesity involves various changes that may be implicated in the relationship between obesity and cancer, such as excess inflammatory cytokines and chronic inflammation, hyperinsulinaemia, insulin resistance, and raised leptin and oestrogens. The Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology have signed a cooperation agreement to work together towards reducing the impact of obesity in cancer. Preventing obesity prevents cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 34 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,962,418
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#294
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,577
of 267,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.