↓ Skip to main content

Proline-catalysed asymmetric ketol cyclizations: The template mechanism revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Sciences, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 321)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Proline-catalysed asymmetric ketol cyclizations: The template mechanism revisited
Published in
Journal of Chemical Sciences, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02708219
Authors

R. Malathi, D. Rajagopal, Zoltan G. Hajos, S. Swaminathan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Chemistry 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#49
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,900
of 58,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them