↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

JACC: Basic to Translational Science 2017 Young Author Award Winners

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Basic to Translational Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
JACC: Basic to Translational Science 2017 Young Author Award Winners
Published in
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas L. Mann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 33%
Design 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,305,383
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#476
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,420
of 344,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.