Title |
What works for threatened species recovery? An empirical evaluation for Australia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10531-010-9977-8 |
Authors |
Martin F. J. Taylor, Paul S. Sattler, Megan Evans, Richard A. Fuller, James E. M. Watson, Hugh P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 3% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 169 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 39 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 23 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 63 | 34% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 15% |