↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging of brain angiogenesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Angiogenesis, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging of brain angiogenesis after stroke
Published in
Angiogenesis, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10456-010-9174-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter R. Seevinck, Lisette H. Deddens, Rick M. Dijkhuizen

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. The initial changes in local perfusion and tissue status underlying loss of brain function are increasingly investigated with noninvasive imaging methods. In addition, there is a growing interest in imaging of processes that contribute to post-stroke recovery. In this review, we discuss the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the formation of new vessels by angiogenesis, which is hypothesized to participate in brain plasticity and functional recovery after stroke. The excellent soft tissue contrast, high spatial and temporal resolution, and versatility render MRI particularly suitable to monitor the dynamic processes involved in vascular remodeling after stroke. Here we review recent advances in the field of MR imaging that are aimed at assessment of tissue perfusion and microvascular characteristics, including cerebral blood flow and volume, vascular density, size and integrity. The potential of MRI to noninvasively monitor the evolution of post-ischemic angiogenic processes is demonstrated from a variety of in vivo studies in experimental stroke models. Finally, we discuss some pitfalls and limitations that may critically affect the accuracy and interpretation of MRI-based measures of (neo)vascularization after stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Neuroscience 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Engineering 10 8%
Physics and Astronomy 7 5%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,520,682
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#359
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,972
of 92,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.