↓ Skip to main content

Views from an asylum: a retrospective case note analysis of a nineteenth century asylum

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Views from an asylum: a retrospective case note analysis of a nineteenth century asylum
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00127-018-1575-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvina May-Yin Chu, Joeke van Santen, Vijay Harbishettar

Abstract

To investigate whether lifelong admission to psychiatric asylum care was usual practice before community psychiatric care was introduced. Historical archives (1838-1938) for 50 patients at the Northampton General Lunatic Asylum in England were studied. Regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between predictor variables (age, gender, marital status, social class) and outcomes (diagnoses, length of stay and admission outcomes). 30 patients (70%) were discharged into the community. 15 (31%) patients were admitted longer than 1 year. Diagnosis of mania was significantly higher in patients who were married. Trend associations were observed for melancholia being diagnosed in higher social class patients and monomania being diagnosed in unmarried patients. No associations were found between predictor variables and length of stay or admission outcomes. These findings challenge the myth that asylum incarceration was a usual practice before the advent of community care. Most patients were discharged from psychiatric asylum hospital within a year of admission even before the advent of psychotropic medication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,111,354
of 24,752,377 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#388
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,642
of 335,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,752,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.