↓ Skip to main content

Lentification in Alpine rivers: patterns of diatom assemblages and functional traits

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Sciences, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Lentification in Alpine rivers: patterns of diatom assemblages and functional traits
Published in
Aquatic Sciences, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00027-018-0587-y
Authors

E. Falasco, E. Piano, A. Doretto, S. Fenoglio, F. Bona

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#457
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,326
of 330,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.