↓ Skip to main content

Queering Bem: Theoretical Intersections Between Sandra Bem’s Scholarship and Queer Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Queering Bem: Theoretical Intersections Between Sandra Bem’s Scholarship and Queer Theory
Published in
Sex Roles, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11199-015-0546-1
Authors

Brandon Balzer Carr, Ella Ben Hagai, Eileen L. Zurbriggen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 35%
Social Sciences 13 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,775,656
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#2,090
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,898
of 279,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.