↓ Skip to main content

Cyclopropane fatty acid biosynthesis in plants: phylogenetic and biochemical analysis of Litchi Kennedy pathway and acyl editing cycle genes

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Cyclopropane fatty acid biosynthesis in plants: phylogenetic and biochemical analysis of Litchi Kennedy pathway and acyl editing cycle genes
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00299-018-2329-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay Shockey, David Kuhn, Tao Chen, Heping Cao, Barbara Freeman, Catherine Mason

Abstract

This report describes the most extensive known gene discovery study from an oilseed that produces cyclopropane fatty acids, a novel industrial feedstock. Nature contains hundreds of examples of plant species that accumulate unusual fatty acids in seed triacylglycerols (TAG). Although lipid metabolic genes have been cloned from several exotic plant species, the underlying mechanisms that control the production of novel TAG species are still poorly understood. One such class of unusual fatty acids contain in-chain cyclopropane or cyclopropene functionalities that confer chemical and physical properties useful in the synthesis of lubricants, cosmetics, dyes, coatings, and other types of valuable industrial feedstocks. These cyclopropyl fatty acids, or CPFAs, are only produced by a small number of plants, primarily in the order Malvidae. Litchi chinensis is one member of this group; its seed oil contains at least 40 mol% CPFAs. Several genes, representing early, middle, and late steps in the Litchi fatty acid and TAG biosynthetic pathways have been cloned and characterized here. The tissue-specific and developmental transcript expression profiles and biochemical characteristics observed indicate which enzymes might play a larger role in Litchi seed TAG biosynthesis and accumulation. These data, therefore, provide insights into which genes likely represent the best targets for either silencing or overexpression, in future metabolic engineering strategies aimed at altering CPFA content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,827,359
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#1,574
of 2,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,646
of 331,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.