↓ Skip to main content

The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3631 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3515 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer
Published in
Nature Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nm.3967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Guinney, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Xin Wang, Aurélien de Reyniès, Andreas Schlicker, Charlotte Soneson, Laetitia Marisa, Paul Roepman, Gift Nyamundanda, Paolo Angelino, Brian M Bot, Jeffrey S Morris, Iris M Simon, Sarah Gerster, Evelyn Fessler, Felipe De Sousa E Melo, Edoardo Missiaglia, Hena Ramay, David Barras, Krisztian Homicsko, Dipen Maru, Ganiraju C Manyam, Bradley Broom, Valerie Boige, Beatriz Perez-Villamil, Ted Laderas, Ramon Salazar, Joe W Gray, Douglas Hanahan, Josep Tabernero, Rene Bernards, Stephen H Friend, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Jan Paul Medema, Anguraj Sadanandam, Lodewyk Wessels, Mauro Delorenzi, Scott Kopetz, Louis Vermeulen, Sabine Tejpar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 13 <1%
Unknown 3454 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 602 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 591 17%
Student > Master 350 10%
Student > Bachelor 306 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 201 6%
Other 556 16%
Unknown 909 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 841 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 794 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 420 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 107 3%
Computer Science 72 2%
Other 248 7%
Unknown 1033 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 548. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#45,049
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#300
of 9,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#462
of 294,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#2
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.