You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/nm.3967 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Justin Guinney, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Xin Wang, Aurélien de Reyniès, Andreas Schlicker, Charlotte Soneson, Laetitia Marisa, Paul Roepman, Gift Nyamundanda, Paolo Angelino, Brian M Bot, Jeffrey S Morris, Iris M Simon, Sarah Gerster, Evelyn Fessler, Felipe De Sousa E Melo, Edoardo Missiaglia, Hena Ramay, David Barras, Krisztian Homicsko, Dipen Maru, Ganiraju C Manyam, Bradley Broom, Valerie Boige, Beatriz Perez-Villamil, Ted Laderas, Ramon Salazar, Joe W Gray, Douglas Hanahan, Josep Tabernero, Rene Bernards, Stephen H Friend, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Jan Paul Medema, Anguraj Sadanandam, Lodewyk Wessels, Mauro Delorenzi, Scott Kopetz, Louis Vermeulen, Sabine Tejpar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 45 | 27% |
Spain | 15 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 14 | 8% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 1% |
Belgium | 2 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 65 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 105 | 63% |
Scientists | 40 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | <1% |
Germany | 8 | <1% |
Spain | 6 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
France | 5 | <1% |
Italy | 3 | <1% |
Belgium | 3 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Other | 13 | <1% |
Unknown | 3461 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 602 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 592 | 17% |
Student > Master | 352 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 306 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 201 | 6% |
Other | 560 | 16% |
Unknown | 909 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 843 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 795 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 420 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 108 | 3% |
Computer Science | 72 | 2% |
Other | 251 | 7% |
Unknown | 1033 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 548. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#45,049
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#300
of 9,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#462
of 294,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#2
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.