↓ Skip to main content

Sub-acute effects of MDMA (±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, "ecstasy") on mood: evidence of gender differences

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Sub-acute effects of MDMA (±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, "ecstasy") on mood: evidence of gender differences
Published in
Psychopharmacology, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00213-001-0995-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne L. Verheyden, Joanne Hadfield, Tara Calin, Valerie H. Curran

Abstract

Research with animals suggests that central 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) function may be attenuated for a period following a single dose of +/-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy'). If the same is true in humans, then functions thought to be modulated by 5-HT may differ in MDMA users compared with non-users a few days after the drug is taken. The present study therefore investigated both acute and sub-acute effects of MDMA on mood of recreational users. A second aim was to determine whether these effects differ for females and males. A parallel group design was used to compare 40 participants who reported taking MDMA with 40 participants who reported using illicit substances excluding MDMA (polydrug controls). Participants were assessed on the night of drug use (day 0) and again 4 days later. Female MDMA users showed higher depression scores mid-week than male users or male or female controls. Mid-week depression in female users was correlated with the amount of MDMA taken on day 0. MDMA users rated lower levels of aggression than controls on the night of drug use but significantly higher levels of aggression mid-week, and in males change in aggression correlated with the amount of MDMA taken on the weekend. There was no association between mood and measures of long-term use of MDMA (e.g. years of use). Women are more susceptible than men to mid-week low mood following weekend use of MDMA; however, both men and women show increased self-rated aggression. These results are interpreted in terms of an attenuation of 5-HT function for a period following acute use of MDMA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,892,139
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#438
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,738
of 48,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.