↓ Skip to main content

Interplay of Genes Regulated by Estrogen and Diindolylmethane in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Interplay of Genes Regulated by Estrogen and Diindolylmethane in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Published in
Molecular Medicine, January 2007
DOI 10.2119/2006-00038.mulvey
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Mulvey, Alamelu Chandrasekaran, Kai Liu, Sarah Lombardi, Xue-Ping Wang, Karen J. Auborn, Leslie Goodwin

Abstract

Diindolylmethane (DIM), a biologically active congener of indole-3-carbinol (I3C) derived from cruciferous vegetables, is a promising agent for the prevention of estrogen-sensitive cancers. Both DIM and estrogen affect transcription of genes by binding receptors, such as aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) or estrogen receptors (ER). Gene regulation by DIM and estradiol (E2) can be very complex. While DIM typically binds the AhR, this complex can directly associate with the ER, recruit co-activators that bind to estrogen-responsive promoters, and activate transcription. Alternately, DIM can bind the ER directly. In this study, we have analyzed gene expression using microarray profiling and quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction in MCF7 breast cancer cells treated with E2 (1 nM) or DIM (25 microM) alone or in combination for 16 h. The interplay of E2 and DIM was reflected in the expression of a subset of genes (<90) in which the combination of E2 and DIM acted either additively or antagonistically to alter gene expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,426,255
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#306
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,091
of 156,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.