↓ Skip to main content

Toward discovery science of human brain function

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2566 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2442 Mendeley
citeulike
17 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward discovery science of human brain function
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0911855107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bharat B. Biswal, Maarten Mennes, Xi-Nian Zuo, Suril Gohel, Clare Kelly, Steve M. Smith, Christian F. Beckmann, Jonathan S. Adelstein, Randy L. Buckner, Stan Colcombe, Anne-Marie Dogonowski, Monique Ernst, Damien Fair, Michelle Hampson, Matthew J. Hoptman, James S. Hyde, Vesa J. Kiviniemi, Rolf Kötter, Shi-Jiang Li, Ching-Po Lin, Mark J. Lowe, Clare Mackay, David J. Madden, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Daniel S. Margulies, Helen S. Mayberg, Katie McMahon, Christopher S. Monk, Stewart H. Mostofsky, Bonnie J. Nagel, James J. Pekar, Scott J. Peltier, Steven E. Petersen, Valentin Riedl, Serge A. R. B. Rombouts, Bart Rypma, Bradley L. Schlaggar, Sein Schmidt, Rachael D. Seidler, Greg J. Siegle, Christian Sorg, Gao-Jun Teng, Juha Veijola, Arno Villringer, Martin Walter, Lihong Wang, Xu-Chu Weng, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli, Peter Williamson, Christian Windischberger, Yu-Feng Zang, Hong-Ying Zhang, F. Xavier Castellanos, Michael P. Milham

Abstract

Although it is being successfully implemented for exploration of the genome, discovery science has eluded the functional neuroimaging community. The core challenge remains the development of common paradigms for interrogating the myriad functional systems in the brain without the constraints of a priori hypotheses. Resting-state functional MRI (R-fMRI) constitutes a candidate approach capable of addressing this challenge. Imaging the brain during rest reveals large-amplitude spontaneous low-frequency (<0.1 Hz) fluctuations in the fMRI signal that are temporally correlated across functionally related areas. Referred to as functional connectivity, these correlations yield detailed maps of complex neural systems, collectively constituting an individual's "functional connectome." Reproducibility across datasets and individuals suggests the functional connectome has a common architecture, yet each individual's functional connectome exhibits unique features, with stable, meaningful interindividual differences in connectivity patterns and strengths. Comprehensive mapping of the functional connectome, and its subsequent exploitation to discern genetic influences and brain-behavior relationships, will require multicenter collaborative datasets. Here we initiate this endeavor by gathering R-fMRI data from 1,414 volunteers collected independently at 35 international centers. We demonstrate a universal architecture of positive and negative functional connections, as well as consistent loci of inter-individual variability. Age and sex emerged as significant determinants. These results demonstrate that independent R-fMRI datasets can be aggregated and shared. High-throughput R-fMRI can provide quantitative phenotypes for molecular genetic studies and biomarkers of developmental and pathological processes in the brain. To initiate discovery science of brain function, the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project dataset is freely accessible at www.nitrc.org/projects/fcon_1000/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 70 3%
United Kingdom 26 1%
Germany 17 <1%
Netherlands 13 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
Italy 9 <1%
Japan 8 <1%
France 6 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Other 63 3%
Unknown 2214 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 596 24%
Researcher 502 21%
Student > Master 266 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 169 7%
Professor 154 6%
Other 505 21%
Unknown 250 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 495 20%
Neuroscience 441 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 304 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 286 12%
Engineering 134 5%
Other 361 15%
Unknown 421 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#633,224
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,768
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,680
of 107,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#37
of 755 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 755 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.