↓ Skip to main content

Multiple neural circuits mediating airway sensations: Recent advances in the neurobiology of the urge-to-cough

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple neural circuits mediating airway sensations: Recent advances in the neurobiology of the urge-to-cough
Published in
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.resp.2015.09.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandria K. Driessen, Michael J. Farrell, Stuart B. Mazzone, Alice E. McGovern

Abstract

The respiratory system is densely innervated by sensory neurons arising from the jugular (superior) and nodose (inferior) vagal ganglia. However, a distinction exists between jugular and nodose neurons as these ganglia developmentally originate from the neural crest and the epibranchial placodes, respectively. This different embryological origin underpins an important source of heterogeneity in vagal afferent biology, and may extend to include fundamentally different central neural circuits that are in receipt of jugular versus nodose afferent inputs. Indeed, recent studies using viral tract tracing and human brain imaging support the notion that airway sensors contribute inputs to multiple central circuits. Understanding the neural pathways arising from the airways and lungs may provide novel insights into aberrant sensations, such as the urge-to-cough, characteristic of respiratory disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Neuroscience 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
#870
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,103
of 290,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.