↓ Skip to main content

Increased cardiovascular risk without generalized arterial dilating diathesis in persons who do not have abdominal aortic aneurysm but who are first‐degree relatives of abdominal aortic aneurysm…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased cardiovascular risk without generalized arterial dilating diathesis in persons who do not have abdominal aortic aneurysm but who are first‐degree relatives of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/1440-1681.12395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel De Basso, Thomas Sandgren, Åsa Rydén Ahlgren, Toste Länne

Abstract

There is a strong genetic predisposition for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but it is unknown whether first-degree relatives to AAA patients but without AAA have a generalized dilating diathesis, defect arterial wall mechanics or increased cardiovascular risk. The aims of the study was to investigate arterial diameters and wall mechanics at multiple arterial sites in these subjects and compare them with controls without a family history of AAA. 118 first-degree relatives to patients with AAA and 66 controls were included (40-80 years). The abdominal aorta, carotid artery, common femoral artery, and popliteal artery were investigated by Echo-tracking ultrasound. The relatives had no arterial dilatation, but rather a tendency of smaller diameters than controls. Relatives had higher heart rate (HR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) than controls. The distensibility coefficient (DC) and the compliance coefficient (CC) were decreased in all arteries in male relatives, adjusted for age and smoking, which was normalized when adjusting for MAP and HR. Female relatives had lower CC in the abdominal aorta, adjusted for age and smoking. When adjusting for MAP and HR, the difference disappeared. No general arterial dilatation in relatives to AAA patients but without AAA was found, supporting the hypothesis that the dilating diathesis is linked to the aneurysmal manifestation in the abdominal aorta. Although the threat of aneurysmal dilatation and rupture seems to be lacking in these subjects, heart rate, blood pressure, and arterial wall stiffness were all increased which may indicate a higher risk of developing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Lecturer 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,426,350
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology
#341
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,766
of 281,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.