| Title |
Microbiota of the indoor environment: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-015-0108-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel I. Adams, Ashley C. Bateman, Holly M. Bik, James F. Meadow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 48% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 11 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 20% |
| Researcher | 83 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 8% |
| Engineering | 30 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 101 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,283,413
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#412
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,456
of 293,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.