↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiologie, Verletzungsentitäten und Behandlungspraxis der Thoraxwandverletzungen

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiologie, Verletzungsentitäten und Behandlungspraxis der Thoraxwandverletzungen
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00113-018-0532-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Schulz-Drost, A. Ekkernkamp, D. Stengel

Abstract

Fractures of the bony chest wall are common injuries. They affect almost every second severely injured person and are gaining more and more importance even after low-energy accidents, especially among older people. Complications mainly occur due to respiratory insufficiency, secondary pulmonary complications and remaining deformities with a functional disorder of the chest wall. In addition to the important conservative therapeutic measures, such as a differentiated pain therapy and pneumonia prophylaxis, operative stabilization of fractures can be an option; however, this is still controversially discussed. A thematically structured overview provides basic knowledge on rib and sternal fractures as well as the treatment options. Epidemiological facts are presented based on the relevant literature and clinical experience. Anatomical principles are intended to improve understanding of the various entities of rib and sternal fractures. For this purpose, the new AO‑/OTA classification system is presented and finally therapeutic options including different osteosynthesis procedures are presented and their importance discussed. Multimodal therapy concepts and closely controlled follow-up examinations of fractures avoid complications or can detect them early. Bony chest wall injuries should still be evaluated for complications and typical fracture patterns identified and classified. Modern osteosynthesis procedures with high patient safety and soft tissue-preserving tissue preparation for the surgical access route to the ribs and sternum provide an excellent opportunity for successful restoration of the anatomical and physiological integrity of the bony thorax.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#439
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,058
of 341,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.