↓ Skip to main content

Review of Brake E. and Ferguson L. (eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law

Overview of attention for article published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
Title
Review of Brake E. and Ferguson L. (eds.): Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law
Published in
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10677-018-9916-4
Authors

Christopher Cowley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,383,782
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#512
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,685
of 333,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.