↓ Skip to main content

Katrina Hutchison and Fiona Jenkins (eds.), Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Value Inquiry, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Katrina Hutchison and Fiona Jenkins (eds.), Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?
Published in
The Journal of Value Inquiry, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10790-015-9481-1
Authors

Leigh Duffy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,574,799
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Value Inquiry
#52
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,116
of 353,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Value Inquiry
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.