Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignant tumours with a poor prognosis. Previously, we have presented a detailed characterisation of the inflammatory infiltrate in BTC. Here, we analysed the impact of the expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) on patient survival and the quantity, as well as the quality of tumour-infiltrating immune cell types in BTC.
MHC I expression was assessed semi-quantitatively in 334 BTC, including extrahepatic (n=129) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (n=146), as well as adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder (n=59). In addition, 71 high-grade biliary intraepithelial lesions (BilIN 3) were included. Results were correlated with data on antitumour inflammation and investigated with respect to their association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival.
BTC showed a wide spectrum of different MHC I expression patterns ranging from complete negativity in some tumours to strong homogenous expression in others. In BilIN 3, significantly higher MHC I expression levels were seen compared to invasive tumours (P=0.004). Patients with strong tumoural MHC I expression had a significantly higher overall survival probability (median survival benefit: 8 months; P=0.006). MHC I expression strongly correlated with the number of tumour-infiltrating T-lymphocytes (CD4(+) and CD8(+)) and macrophages.
Differences of MHC I expression predict patient outcome and show correlations with specific components of the inflammatory infiltrate in BTC. These findings contribute to a better understanding of immune response and immune escape phenomena in cholangiocarcinogenesis.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 13 October 2015; doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.337 www.bjcancer.com.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,373,196
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#8,608
of 10,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,385
of 280,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#53
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
