↓ Skip to main content

Myocardial tissue engineering: toward a bioartificial pump

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Myocardial tissue engineering: toward a bioartificial pump
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00441-011-1267-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hidekazu Sekine, Tatsuya Shimizu, Teruo Okano

Abstract

Regenerative therapies, including cell injection and bioengineered tissue transplantation, have the potential to treat severe heart failure. Direct implantation of isolated skeletal myoblasts and bone-marrow-derived cells has already been clinically performed and research on fabricating three-dimensional (3-D) cardiac grafts using tissue engineering technologies has also now been initiated. In contrast to conventional scaffold-based methods, we have proposed cell sheet-based tissue engineering, which involves stacking confluently cultured cell sheets to construct 3-D cell-dense tissues. Upon layering, individual cardiac cell sheets integrate to form a single, continuous, cell-dense tissue that resembles native cardiac tissue. The transplantation of layered cardiac cell sheets is able to repair damaged hearts. As the next step, we have attempted to promote neovascularization within bioengineered myocardial tissues to overcome the longstanding limitations of engineered tissue thickness. Finally, as a possible advanced therapy, we are now trying to fabricate functional myocardial tubes that may have a potential for circulatory support. Cell sheet-based tissue engineering technologies therefore show an enormous promise as a novel approach in the field of myocardial tissue engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2011.
All research outputs
#19,237,853
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,706
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,944
of 243,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.