Title |
Hemp as a raw material for industrial applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Euphytica, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10681-004-4749-8 |
Authors |
Paolo Ranalli, Gianpietro Venturi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 277 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 17% |
Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
Researcher | 29 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 13% |
Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 21% |
Engineering | 30 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 6% |
Materials Science | 14 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 5% |
Other | 54 | 19% |
Unknown | 92 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,171,028
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#38
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,183
of 133,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.